CVE-2025-12521
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Analytify Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 7.0.3 via the Analytify Tag HTML details. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract usernames from source code. While we generally do not assign CVE IDs to username exposure issues, this vendor has specifically requested we consider it a vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Analytify Pro WordPress plugin versions up to 7.0.3 expose usernames in the HTML source code through the Analytify Tag feature. Unauthenticated attackers can view the page source and extract usernames that are embedded in the Analytify Tag HTML details.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Analytify Pro plugin versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and find Analytify Pro. Check the version number displayed, or inspect the plugin header in /wp-content/plugins/analytify-pro/analytify-pro.phpAffected if Version is 7.0.3 or lower (any version up to and including 7.0.3)
-
Confirm Analytify Tag feature is enabledIn WordPress admin, go to Analytify > Settings. Look for Analytify Tag settings (usually under Dashboard or Profile settings). Check if the feature is turned on.Affected if The Analytify Tag functionality is enabled on the site
-
Inspect page HTML for username exposureView the public-facing site homepage or any page with analytics. Right-click and select View Page Source (or use browser DevTools > Elements). Search for 'analytify' and examine any HTML comments or elements containing the Analytify Tag. Look for visible username strings in data attributes or HTML content.Affected if Usernames are visible in HTML source within Analytify Tag elements (look for strings like 'user_login', 'user_nicename', or actual usernames in analytify-related divs or comments)
If Analytify Pro version is 7.0.3 or lower AND the Analytify Tag feature is enabled AND usernames appear in the page HTML source, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to version 7.0.4 or later when available. Until a patch is released, consider disabling the Analytify Tag functionality or restricting access via firewall rules.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12521 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12521 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data