CVE-2025-12543
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in the Undertow HTTP server core, which is used in WildFly, JBoss EAP, and other Java applications. The Undertow library fails to properly validate the Host header in incoming HTTP requests.As a result, requests containing malformed or malicious Host headers are processed without rejection, enabling attackers to poison caches, perform internal network scans, or hijack user sessions.
In the news
Third-party coverage- Weekly Recap: SD-WAN 0-Day, Critical CVEs, Telegram Probe ...
- Weekly Recap: AI Automation Exploits, Telecom Espionage, Prompt ...
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceAffected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.14.4= 8.0= 7.0.0>= 8.0, < 8.0.12>= 8.1.0, < 8.1.3all versions= 7.0.0all versions= 7.0= 7.0< 2.2.39>= 2.3.0, < 2.3.21CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.2.392.3.214.14.4
Undertow 2.2.39+/2.3.21+; JBoss EAP 8.0.12+; JBoss EAP 8.1.3+; Camel 4.14.4+ (or apply Red Hat security advisories for Fuse, Data Grid, Process Automation, SSO)
- Identify the specific affected component in your deployment (Undertow, JBoss EAP, Fuse, Camel, Data Grid, Process Automation, or SSO)
- For Undertow direct deployments: upgrade Undertow to version 2.2.39 or later (2.x series) or 2.3.21 or later (2.3.x series)
- For JBoss EAP 8.0: upgrade to version 8.0.12 or later
- For JBoss EAP 8.1: upgrade to version 8.1.3 or later
- For JBoss EAP 7.0: contact Red Hat for available patches as the description indicates all versions are affected
- For Apache Camel: upgrade to version 4.14.4 or later
- For Fuse, Data Grid, Process Automation, and SSO: apply the corresponding Red Hat security update that patches the Undertow component
- After upgrade, verify that the Host header validation is working correctly by testing with malformed headers
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12543 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12543 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data