CVE-2025-1273
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA maliciously crafted PDF file, when linked or imported into Autodesk applications, can force a Heap-Based Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in multiple Autodesk applications when processing maliciously crafted PDF files that are linked or imported. The vulnerability allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process by leveraging the heap overflow to overwrite memory locations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2023, < 2023.1.7>= 2024, < 2024.3.2>= 2025, < 2025.4.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Autodesk Revit installationCheck for Revit installation by looking for the executable (Revit.exe) in typical installation paths such as C:\Program Files\Autodesk\Revit 2023, C:\Program Files\Autodesk\Revit 2024, or C:\Program Files\Autodesk\Revit 2025. You can also check Add/Remove Programs on Windows or use command: dir /s "C:\Program Files\Autodesk\Revit*" 2>nulAffected if Revit is not installed on the system
-
Determine installed Revit versionRight-click on the Revit.exe file, select Properties, then view the Details tab to see the Product version. Alternatively, open Revit and go to Help > About Autodesk Revit to view the exact version number including the build numberAffected if The version number is not displayed or cannot be determined
-
Compare version against affected rangesCompare your installed version (e.g., 2023.1.5, 2024.2.1, 2025.3.0) against the vulnerable ranges: 2023 versions before 2023.1.7, 2024 versions before 2024.3.2, and 2025 versions before 2025.4.1Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: >= 2023 and < 2023.1.7, OR >= 2024 and < 2024.3.2, OR >= 2025 and < 2025.4.1
-
Verify PDF import/link feature usageCheck if users have imported or linked PDF files into Revit projects. Review recent project files or check Revit usage logs for PDF-related operations. On Windows, search for .pdf files in project directories or check the Links panel in Revit for attached PDF under the Import/Link functionAffected if PDF files are being imported or linked into Revit projects
A user is affected if Autodesk Revit is installed with a version matching the affected ranges AND PDF files are being imported or linked into the application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2023.1.72024.3.22025.4.1
Avoid opening or importing PDF files from untrusted or unknown sources in affected Autodesk applications. Apply vendor patches when available and implement application sandboxing or file type restrictions as a defense-in-depth measure.
Revit 2023.1.7, Revit 2024.3.2, or Revit 2025.4.1 (depending on your version line)
- 1. Open Revit and go to Help > About Autodesk Revit to check your current version number
- 2. Navigate to the Autodesk Account or Support portal at www.autodesk.com to download the appropriate fixed release for your version line
- 3. For Revit 2023 users: Download and install version 2023.1.7 or later
- 4. For Revit 2024 users: Download and install version 2024.3.2 or later
- 5. For Revit 2025 users: Download and install version 2025.4.1 or later
- 6. Restart Revit after installation completes
- 7. Verify the installed version matches or exceeds the fixed release (Help > About Autodesk Revit)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1273 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1273 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data