Improper AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-285

CVE-2025-12814

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-11-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The SiteSEO – SEO Simplified plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to n incorrect capability check on the siteseo_reset_settings function in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, who have been granted access to at least on SiteSEO setting capability, to reset the plugin's settings.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The SiteSEO WordPress plugin has a broken access control vulnerability in the siteseo_reset_settings function. The function performs an incorrect capability check, allowing any authenticated user with at least one SiteSEO setting capability to reset all plugin settings to default, despite lacking proper authorization for this action.

MitigationUpdate to version 1.3.3 or later when available, or implement proper capability checks using WordPress capability functions (e.g., manage_options) on all settings reset/update functions to ensure only administrators can modify plugin configuration.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if SiteSEO plugin is installed
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'SiteSEO' or check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for a siteseo folder
    Affected if SiteSEO plugin is present in the WordPress installation
  2. Determine the installed SiteSEO version
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins, find SiteSEO, and note the version number displayed
    Affected if The installed version is earlier than 1.3.3 (or if version cannot be determined but the plugin is present)
  3. Verify if any non-administrator users have SiteSEO-related capabilities
    Review user roles and capabilities in WordPress (Users > All Users) or use a role management plugin to check if Editors, Authors, or Contributors have any SiteSEO-specific capabilities assigned
    Affected if Any user role below Administrator has SiteSEO capabilities enabled (not just manage_options)
  4. Check for the siteseo_reset_settings function exposure
    Inspect the SiteSEO plugin files (particularly in the admin or settings PHP files) for the function 'siteseo_reset_settings' and verify the capability check it uses - look for weak capability checks like 'edit_posts' rather than 'manage_options'
    Affected if The function uses a weak capability check that allows any authenticated user with basic SiteSEO permissions to reset all settings

A site is affected if SiteSEO plugin version is earlier than 1.3.3 AND any non-administrator user account with SiteSEO capabilities exists on the site.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to version 1.3.3 or later when available, or implement proper capability checks using WordPress capability functions (e.g., manage_options) on all settings reset/update functions to ensure only administrators can modify plugin configuration.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12814 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12814 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data