CVE-2025-12922
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in OpenClinica Community Edition up to 3.12.2/3.13. This affects an unknown part of the file /ImportCRFData?action=confirm of the component CRF Data Import. Performing manipulation of the argument xml_file results in path traversal. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePath traversal vulnerability in OpenClinica Community Edition's CRF Data Import component allows manipulation of the xml_file parameter in /ImportCRFData?action=confirm to access arbitrary files on the server filesystem. The vulnerability affects versions up to 3.12.2/3.13, can be exploited remotely, and a public exploit exists.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.12.2= 3.13CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm OpenClinica is runningIdentify if OpenClinica web application is accessible on your network by accessing the application URL and verifying the OpenClinica login page or web interface loads.Affected if OpenClinica is exposed and accessible on the network
-
Check installed OpenClinica versionLocate the OpenClinica version information in the application (typically found in the login page footer, about section, or in deployment descriptors/web.xml file within the application deployment directory). Compare your version to the affected versions 3.12.2 and 3.13.Affected if Version is 3.12.2 or 3.13
-
Verify CRF Data Import module is enabledCheck if the CRF Data Import functionality is available by logging into OpenClinica and attempting to access the data import feature, or by reviewing application configuration files for enabled modules.Affected if CRF Data Import module is enabled and accessible to users
-
Inspect web access logs for path traversal attemptsReview web server or application logs for requests to /ImportCRFData with xml_file parameter containing path traversal patterns such as ../ or absolute paths.Affected if Suspicious path traversal patterns are found in logs targeting the xml_file parameter
Your environment is affected if OpenClinica versions 3.12.2 or 3.13 are running with the CRF Data Import module enabled and exposed to network users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince the vendor did not respond to early disclosure and no patch is available, implement compensating controls such as restricting network access to the import functionality, deploying WAF rules to block path traversal patterns in the xml_file parameter, and applying strict input validation on the server side.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12922 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12922 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data