CVE-2025-12927
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in DedeBIZ up to 6.3.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /admin/archives_add.php. Such manipulation of the argument flags[] leads to sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in DedeBIZ CMS (versions up to 6.3.2) in the /admin/archives_add.php file through the flags[] parameter, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 6.3.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm DedeBIZ CMS installationLook for the DedeBIZ CMS installation directory (commonly /dedebiz, /dede, or in web root). Check for characteristic files like /admin/archives_add.php, /include/common.php, or the presence of a /templets directory.Affected if DedeBIZ CMS is installed on the server
-
Identify installed versionCheck the version file - typically in /include/common.php, /data/admin/ver.txt, or a version.php file in the includes directory. Look for a version number string like '6.3.x' or '6.2.x'.Affected if The installed version is 6.3.2 or lower, or the version cannot be determined and the file exists
-
Verify vulnerable file existsCheck if the file /admin/archives_add.php exists in the web root. This file handles article/archive creation and processes the flags[] parameter.Affected if The file /admin/archives_add.php exists in the installation
-
Check admin panel exposureDetermine if the /admin/ directory is accessible from the network. Test accessing /admin/archives_add.php directly via HTTP/HTTPS from an external location or check web server access logs for requests to this endpoint.Affected if The admin panel (or specifically archives_add.php) is reachable from untrusted networks
-
Inspect flags[] parameter handlingReview the archives_add.php code around line processing the flags[] array parameter. Look for direct inclusion of this array in SQL queries without proper sanitization or use of prepared statements.Affected if The code uses flags[] directly in database queries without parameterized queries or input validation
A user is affected if DedeBIZ CMS version 6.3.2 or lower is installed, the /admin/archives_add.php file exists, and the admin panel or specific endpoint is accessible (since the SQL injection requires submitting the flags[] parameter through this file).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply input validation and parameterized queries for the flags[] parameter in archives_add.php; upgrade to patched version if available; restrict admin panel access to authorized users.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12927 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12927 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data