CVE-2025-12934
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Beaver Builder – WordPress Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access and modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'duplicate_wpml_layout' function in all versions up to, and including, 2.9.4.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to update arbitrary posts with the content of other existing posts, potentially exposing private and password-protected content and deleting any content that is not saved in revisions or backups. Posts must have been created with Beaver Builder to be copied or updated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a broken access control vulnerability in the Beaver Builder WordPress plugin. The 'duplicate_wpmlml_layout' function lacks a capability check, allowing any authenticated user with Subscriber-level access or higher to read and overwrite content of arbitrary posts created with Beaver Builder. An attacker can exploit this to expose private/password-protected content and destroy unsaved content by overwriting posts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Beaver Builder plugin is installedCheck the WordPress plugin directory for the Beaver Builder plugin files, typically located at /wp-content/plugins/bb-plugin/ or /wp-content/plugins/beaver-builder-lite-version/Affected if Plugin files exist in the plugins directory
-
Identify the installed Beaver Builder versionCheck the plugin header in the main plugin file (e.g., bb-plugin.php or index.php) for the 'Version' field, or look in WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed PluginsAffected if Version is lower than 2.9.5 (the fixed release)
-
Verify user registration is enabledIn WordPress admin, go to Settings > General and check 'Anyone can register' is enabled, or inspect the 'users_can_register' option in the wp_options tableAffected if User registration is enabled and allows Subscriber role or higher
-
Check for existing user accounts with Subscriber-level accessIn WordPress admin, go to Users > All Users and review the role column, or query wp_users and wp_usermeta tables for users with 'subscriber' role capabilityAffected if Any user account exists with Subscriber, Contributor, Author, or Editor role (these roles all have equal or greater access than Subscriber)
-
Confirm Beaver Builder post types are in useQuery the wp_posts table for posts where post_type contains 'fl-builder' or check for Beaver Builder templates/rows in the databaseAffected if Any posts were created using Beaver Builder (the plugin's post types exist in the database)
The environment is affected if Beaver Builder plugin is installed with a version lower than 2.9.5 AND any authenticated user with Subscriber-level or higher access exists on the site.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to version 2.9.5 or later when available. Until then, restrict user registrations or temporarily disable the plugin if possible.
Beaver Builder version 2.9.5 or later
- Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Find the Beaver Builder plugin
- Click 'Update now' if an update is available, or manually update to version 2.9.5 or later
- Verify the plugin version after update to confirm the fix is applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12934 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12934 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data