CVE-2025-12970
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe extract_name function in Fluent Bit in_docker input plugin copies container names into a fixed size stack buffer without validating length. An attacker who can create containers or control container names, can supply a long name that overflows the buffer, leading to process crash or arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe extract_name function in Fluent Bit's in_docker input plugin copies container names into a fixed-size stack buffer without validating the name length first. An attacker who can create containers or control container names can supply an overly long name that overflows the buffer, leading to process crash or arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Fluent Bit installation and versionRun command: flb-version or fluent-bit --version to retrieve the installed Fluent Bit versionAffected if Version is exactly 4.1.0 of Treasuredata Fluent Bit
-
Determine if in_docker input plugin is in useCheck Fluent Bit configuration files (fluent-bit.conf, *.conf in /etc/fluent-bit/) or running configuration for 'input' section referencing 'in_docker' or 'docker' pluginAffected if The in_docker input plugin is enabled and configured to collect container metadata
-
Assess container name control scopeReview who has permissions to create containers or modify container names in the environment (e.g., check Docker/Kubernetes RBAC policies, container runtime permissions, or orchestration access controls)Affected if Untrusted or external actors can create containers or supply container names that Fluent Bit will process
-
Inspect for process crashes or anomalous behaviorReview system logs (journalctl, syslog, /var/log/messages) and Fluent Bit service logs for segfaults, crashes, or unexpected termination events occurring around the in_docker pluginAffected if Fluent Bit process has crashed or exhibited unstable behavior, particularly after container creation events
A defender is affected if running Treasuredata Fluent Bit version 4.1.0 with the in_docker input plugin enabled and untrusted users can create or control container names that Fluent Bit processes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Fluent Bit to a patched version once available; until then, restrict who can create or control container names and apply network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted container environments.
Fluent Bit 4.1.1 or latest stable 4.x release
- 1. Identify all systems running Fluent Bit 4.1.0 using package managers or container inventories
- 2. Stop the Fluent Bit service on each affected system before updating
- 3. Upgrade Fluent Bit to the latest stable release (recommended: version 4.1.1 or later if available, otherwise latest 4.x release)
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version with: fluent-bit --version
- 5. Restart the Fluent Bit service and confirm normal operation
- 6. Monitor logs for any errors related to the in_docker input plugin
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12970 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12970 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data