CVE-2025-13003
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAuthorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Aksis Computer Services and Consulting Inc. AxOnboard allows Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers. This issue affects AxOnboard: from 3.2.0 before 3.3.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAuthorization bypass vulnerability in AxOnboard where user-controlled keys allow exploitation of trusted identifiers. The vulnerability permits attackers to manipulate object references or session identifiers to access unauthorized resources or functionality, likely due to insufficient validation of user-supplied identifiers against session state.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AxOnboard installationLocate the AxOnboard application or service in your environment. Check for installed packages, running services, or application directories named 'AxOnboard' or similar variants.Affected if AxOnboard software is present in the environment
-
Determine installed AxOnboard versionQuery the installed version using package manager, application metadata, or runtime version information (e.g., --version flag, about page, or version file in installation directory). Compare against the affected range: versions prior to 3.3.0.Affected if Installed version is earlier than 3.3.0 or version cannot be determined
-
Verify user-controlled identifier handlingInspect application logs, request parameters, or API endpoints that accept user-supplied keys, object references, or session identifiers. Look for endpoints that process these identifiers without explicit session validation.Affected if Application accepts and processes user-controlled identifiers in requests
-
Check authorization validation logicReview access control code, middleware, or configuration to determine if user-supplied identifiers are validated against the authenticated session context before granting resource access.Affected if No server-side validation exists or validation can be bypassed for user-supplied identifiers
You are affected if AxOnboard version is below 3.3.0 and the application processes user-controlled identifiers without strict session-bound validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade AxOnboard to version 3.3.0 or later. If upgrade is immediately impractical, implement strict server-side validation of all user-controlled identifiers against authenticated session context and enforce authorization checks before any resource access.
3.3.0
- 1. Identify all deployments of AxOnboard version 3.2.0 through 3.2.x in your environment
- 2. Review the AxOnboard release notes or change log for version 3.3.0 to understand changes and any known migration requirements
- 3. Create a backup of the current AxOnboard configuration and database
- 4. Test the upgrade in a staging or development environment before deploying to production
- 5. Upgrade AxOnboard from version 3.2.x to version 3.3.0 or later
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the application version and testing core functionality
- 7. Confirm the authorization bypass vulnerability is remediated by testing access controls
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13003 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13003 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data