CVE-2025-13063
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in DinukaNavaratna Dee Store 1.0. Affected is an unknown function. Executing manipulation can lead to missing authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been published and may be used. Multiple endpoints are affected.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDinukaNavaratna Dee Store 1.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability (broken access control) affecting multiple endpoints. Remote attackers can manipulate requests to execute privileged functions without proper authentication or authorization checks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Dee Store installationCheck running web services or browse to the application's base URL; look for 'Dee Store' branding or login page identifying the softwareAffected if The application is accessible and identifies as DinukaNavaratna Dee Store version 1.0
-
Confirm application versionInspect the application's login page, footer, or admin dashboard for a version number; compare against '1.0'Affected if The installed version is Dee Store 1.0 or earlier
-
Test unauthenticated access to admin endpointsUse a web proxy or curl to send requests to common admin paths (/admin, /dashboard, /manage) without providing any authentication tokens or credentialsAffected if Requests to sensitive endpoints return successful responses (HTTP 200) without authentication
-
Verify authorization on privileged functionsCreate a regular user account if available, then attempt to access or modify privileged resources (user data, orders, settings) that should require admin-level permissionsAffected if A non-privileged or unauthenticated user can access or manipulate functions restricted to administrators
-
Inspect HTTP responses for horizontal/vertical privilege escalationCapture and review HTTP responses when accessing different user role endpoints; check if response includes data or actions beyond the current user's authorization levelAffected if Responses contain administrative data, allow privileged operations, or bypass role-based restrictions
If Dee Store 1.0 is running and sensitive endpoints can be accessed or manipulated without proper authentication or authorization, the environment is affected by CVE-2025-13063.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement role-based access control (RBAC) and proper authorization validation on all sensitive endpoints; audit the application for additional access control weaknesses.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13063 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13063 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data