Aspera OrchestratorApplication · Ibm

CVE-2025-13213

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.1.3 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Aspera Orchestrator 3.0.0 through 4.1.2 is vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation of input by the HOST headers. This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cross-site scripting, cache poisoning or session hijacking

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Aspera Orchestrator versions 3.0.0 through 4.1.2 contain an HTTP header injection vulnerability in the HOST header processing. The application fails to properly validate or sanitize HOST header input, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers. This can be exploited for cross-site scripting attacks via injected headers, cache poisoning by manipulating cached responses, or session hijacking through header-based session manipulation.

MitigationImplement strict input validation on HOST headers to reject or sanitize unexpected characters (especially newlines and carriage returns). Consider using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) as a compensating control until code-level fixes are applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Aspera OrchestratorApplication
Affected:>= 3.0.0, < 4.1.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine IBM Aspera Orchestrator version
    Access the product web interface or check the installation directory for version information. Typically found in the login page footer, about section, or installation metadata files. Compare the found version against the affected range: 3.0.0 through 4.1.2.
    Affected if The installed version falls within 3.0.0 to 4.1.2 inclusive
  2. Verify web interface is accessible
    Confirm that the IBM Aspera Orchestrator web interface is reachable over HTTP/HTTPS. This vulnerability exploits the processing of incoming HTTP requests, so the web component must be exposed.
    Affected if The web interface is accessible to network traffic
  3. Identify if HOST header is used in requests
    Review incoming HTTP traffic or proxy logs to determine if the application processes HOST headers from client requests. This is the default behavior for most web applications.
    Affected if The application processes HOST headers from incoming requests (default behavior)
  4. Check for input validation on HOST header
    If you have access to configuration files or application logs, inspect whether there is any explicit validation or sanitization of the HOST header. Look for configuration settings related to header validation or security filters.
    Affected if No explicit HOST header validation is configured or enforced

If IBM Aspera Orchestrator version is between 3.0.0 and 4.1.2 and the web interface processes incoming HTTP requests, the environment is vulnerable to HTTP header injection via HOST header.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.1.3 or later
Fixed in 4.1.3
Interim mitigation

Implement strict input validation on HOST headers to reject or sanitize unexpected characters (especially newlines and carriage returns). Consider using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) as a compensating control until code-level fixes are applied.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

4.1.3

  1. Upgrade IBM Aspera Orchestrator to version 4.1.3 or later to resolve the HTTP header injection vulnerability

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Aspera Orchestrator Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,260
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,816.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13213 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13213 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data