Race ConditionWeakness · CWE-362

CVE-2025-13231

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Fancy Product Designer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.4.8. This is due to a time-of-check/time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in the 'url' parameter of the fpd_custom_uplod_file AJAX action. The plugin validates the URL by calling getimagesize() first, then later retrieves the same URL using file_get_contents(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to exploit the timing gap to perform SSRF attacks by serving a valid image during validation, then changing the response to redirect to arbitrary internal or external URLs during the actual fetch.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Fancy Product Designer WordPress plugin has a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability in the fpd_custom_uplod_file AJAX action. The plugin first validates URLs via getimagesize() to ensure they point to images, then later fetches content using file_get_contents(). Attackers can exploit the timing gap by serving a valid image during validation, then redirecting to arbitrary internal/external URLs during the actual fetch, enabling unauthenticated SSRF attacks.

MitigationUpdate to version 6.4.9 or later which should contain the patch. Alternatively, disable the fpd_custom_uplod_file AJAX action or implement server-side filtering to block external URL submissions until the patch is available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Fancy Product Designer plugin is installed
    Navigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and verify 'Fancy Product Designer' appears in the installed plugins list, or check the plugin directory for fancy-product-designer folder
    Affected if The plugin is installed and active
  2. Identify the installed plugin version
    In WordPress admin > Plugins > Fancy Product Designer, click on the plugin name to view details, or read the version from the plugin header in wp-content/plugins/fancy-product-designer/fancy-product-designer.php
    Affected if The version is lower than 6.4.9 (the patched version)
  3. Verify the vulnerable AJAX action is exposed
    Check if the fpd_custom_uplod_file AJAX endpoint is accessible by reviewing the plugin PHP code for do_action('wp_ajax_fpd_custom_uplod_file') or do_action('wp_ajax_nopriv_fpd_custom_uplod_file') calls, or test by making a POST request to /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php with action=fpd_custom_uplod_file
    Affected if The AJAX action is registered and accessible to unauthenticated users (wp_ajax_nopriv_ hook exists)
  4. Determine if external URL submissions are processed
    Review the fpd_custom_uplod_file AJAX handler function in the plugin code to see if it accepts and processes URL parameters, or test by submitting a request with an external URL in the upload parameter
    Affected if The AJAX handler accepts and processes URLs from user input without additional validation

You are affected if Fancy Product Designer is installed with a version lower than 6.4.9 AND the fpd_custom_uplod_file AJAX action is accessible and processes external URLs.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to version 6.4.9 or later which should contain the patch. Alternatively, disable the fpd_custom_uplod_file AJAX action or implement server-side filtering to block external URL submissions until the patch is available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13231 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13231 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data