CVE-2025-13280
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was determined in CodeAstro Simple Inventory System 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /index.php of the component Login. Executing a manipulation of the argument Username can lead to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCodeAstro Simple Inventory System 1.0 contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the login functionality at /index.php. The Username parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries, allowing an attacker to inject malicious SQL commands. This can lead to authentication bypass, unauthorized data access, or potential remote code execution depending on database configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm CodeAstro Simple Inventory System is installedLocate the web application directory or check for codeAstro-related files on the server. Common paths may include /var/www/html/, /www/, or the web root directory. Look for files named 'index.php' with 'Simple Inventory System' content or branding.Affected if CodeAstro Simple Inventory System software is present on the server
-
Verify the version is 1.0Check version files, README files, or the footer/source code of the application for a version number. Compare the installed version against the affected range (version 1.0).Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0
-
Check if the login page is accessibleAttempt to access the /index.php endpoint via HTTP/HTTPS from the server or internal network. Confirm the page loads and contains a login form with a Username field.Affected if The login page at /index.php is reachable and displays a login form with a Username input field
-
Determine if the application is network-exposedCheck network configuration, firewall rules, or web server settings to see if the application is accessible from external networks or the internet.Affected if The vulnerable /index.php login page is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet
A user is affected if CodeAstro Simple Inventory System version 1.0 is installed and the login page at /index.php is accessible on their network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements in the login processing code. Apply input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied parameters. As a temporary control, consider implementing a web application firewall.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13280 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13280 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data