Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-13296

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
61/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tekrom Technology Inc. T-Soft E-Commerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects T-Soft E-Commerce: through 28112025.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tekrom Technology Inc. T-Soft E-Commerce platform. The vulnerability allows attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions (such as changing account settings, making purchases, or modifying data) by exploiting the lack of proper anti-CSRF token validation on state-changing requests.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations (forms and AJAX requests), configure SameSite cookie attributes, and validate Origin/Referer headers to prevent cross-origin forged requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify T-Soft E-Commerce installation
    Review your web application inventory or check HTTP headers/HTML source for 'T-Soft' or 'Tekrom' branding and version information
    Affected if The application is confirmed to be Tekrom T-Soft E-Commerce platform and no version data shows it is patched post-CVE-2025-13296
  2. Inspect state-changing forms for CSRF tokens
    Examine the HTML source of forms that perform state-changing actions (user registration, login, account settings update, cart modifications, checkout, order submission). Look for hidden input fields containing anti-CSRF tokens or similar security tokens
    Affected if State-changing forms lack hidden CSRF token fields or do not include token parameters in their submission URLs
  3. Verify AJAX requests include CSRF protection
    Review JavaScript code and network requests for AJAX calls that modify data (profile updates, adding to cart, placing orders). Check if these requests include anti-CSRF tokens in headers or request bodies
    Affected if AJAX requests performing state changes do not include anti-CSRF tokens in headers or request payloads
  4. Check SameSite cookie attributes
    Inspect HTTP response headers (Set-Cookie) for session or authentication cookies. Verify if SameSite attribute is set to 'Strict' or 'Lax', or if it is missing entirely
    Affected if Authentication cookies either lack the SameSite attribute or have it set to 'None' without Secure flag, indicating improper CSRF protection
  5. Test Origin/Referer header validation
    Send a crafted request from an external origin to a state-changing endpoint and observe if the server rejects it due to missing or mismatched Origin/Referer headers
    Affected if The server accepts state-changing requests without validating Origin or Referer headers, allowing cross-origin forged requests to succeed

The environment is affected if it runs Tekrom T-Soft E-Commerce platform and state-changing operations lack anti-CSRF token validation, proper SameSite cookie settings, or Origin/Referer header checks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations (forms and AJAX requests), configure SameSite cookie attributes, and validate Origin/Referer headers to prevent cross-origin forged requests.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13296 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13296 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data