CVE-2025-13396
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in code-projects Courier Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /add-office.php. This manipulation of the argument OfficeName causes sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Courier Management System 1.0's /add-office.php file allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands through the OfficeName parameter. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable and has a critical CVSS score of 9.8.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Courier Management System is installedLocate the application web root directory and check for files typical of the Carmelogarcia Courier Management System. Look for directories containing 'courier' or 'cms' in the web server document root.Affected if The application files for Courier Management System version 1.0 are found on the server
-
Verify the vulnerable file existsCheck for the presence of add-office.php in the web application's directory structure, typically within the main application folder or admin directory.Affected if The file /add-office.php exists in the application directory
-
Confirm the application is accessibleAttempt to access the application's login or main page over HTTP/HTTPS to verify the system is running and reachable.Affected if The Courier Management System is accessible over the network (web interface responds)
-
Check if OfficeName parameter is processedReview the source code of add-office.php to determine if the OfficeName parameter is used in SQL queries without prepared statements or parameterization.Affected if The OfficeName parameter in add-office.php is directly included in SQL queries without sanitization or parameterized queries
The environment is affected if Carmelogarcia Courier Management System version 1.0 is installed, the file add-office.php exists, and the application is accessible with the OfficeName parameter being processed without SQL injection protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all database operations in add-office.php and conduct a comprehensive code review to identify and remediate similar SQL injection vulnerabilities throughout the application.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13396 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13396 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data