CVE-2025-13428
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability exists in the SecOps SOAR server. The custom integrations feature allowed an authenticated user with an "IDE role" to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) in the server. The flaw stemmed from weak validation of uploaded Python package code. An attacker could upload a package containing a malicious setup.py file, which would execute on the server during the installation process, leading to potential server compromise. No customer action is required. All customers have been automatically upgraded to the fixed version: 6.3.64 or higher.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe SecOps SOAR server custom integrations feature had weak validation of uploaded Python packages, allowing authenticated users with IDE role to upload malicious packages containing executable code in setup.py that would run during installation, leading to remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.3.64CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Google Security Operations Soar versionAccess the system administration panel or use the product's built-in version check command (typically found in Help > About or system settings). Note the full version number displayed.Affected if The displayed version is lower than 6.3.64 (e.g., 6.3.50, 6.2.100, etc.)
-
Verify custom integrations feature statusNavigate to the integrations or plugins management section in the SOAR administrative interface. Look for custom integrations or Python package upload functionality.Affected if The custom integrations feature is enabled and accessible to users
-
Identify users with IDE roleAccess the user management or role administration section. Search for users assigned the IDE role, which permits access to the custom integration development/upload functionality.Affected if Any user account possesses the IDE role permission
-
Review recently uploaded custom packagesIn the integrations or custom packages section, examine any uploaded Python packages. Inspect the package metadata and check for unexpected or unverified setup.py files.Affected if There are custom integration packages present, particularly those uploaded by users with IDE role that have not been reviewed
-
Check audit logs for IDE role activityReview the security audit or activity logs for events related to IDE role usage, custom package uploads, or integration installations performed by IDE role users.Affected if IDE role users have recently uploaded or installed custom packages
You are affected if your Google Security Operations Soar version is below 6.3.64 AND the custom integrations feature is enabled with users possessing IDE role, allowing potential upload of malicious Python packages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data6.3.64
The vulnerability has been automatically patched; customers should verify their systems are running version 6.3.64 or higher to confirm the fix is applied.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13428 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13428 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data