Incorrect Permission AssignmentWeakness · CWE-732

CVE-2025-13703

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2025-12-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
VIPRE Advanced Security Incorrect Permission Assignment Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of VIPRE Advanced Security for PC. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the product installer. The issue results from incorrect permissions on a folder. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-27147.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

VIPRE Advanced Security installer sets incorrect permissions on a folder, allowing local low-privileged attackers to escalate to SYSTEM context and execute arbitrary code.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patch or update to a corrected version that properly secures folder permissions; verify no lingering permission misconfigurations remain.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if VIPRE Advanced Security is installed
    Check Windows registry for the product at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{ProductID} or look for VIPRE folder in Program Files
    Affected if VIPRE Advanced Security is found on the system
  2. Locate the VIPRE installation directory
    Check the InstallLocation value in the registry key found above, or look for VIPRE folders in C:\Program Files or C:\Program Files (x86)
    Affected if An installation directory exists and contains VIPRE binaries
  3. Identify folders created by the installer with weak permissions
    Use icacls or PowerShell Get-Acl to list permissions on the VIPRE installation folder and subfolders, focusing on folders writable by Users or Everyone groups
    Affected if Any system folder (especially Program Files location) grants write/modify access to low-privileged users or Everyone
  4. Verify if low-privileged users can modify executable locations
    As a standard user (non-admin), attempt to create or modify files in the VIPRE installation folder or subfolders
    Affected if A low-privileged account can write or modify files in folders that should require administrator privileges
  5. Check for service executable paths with weak ACLs
    Run sc qc VIPREServiceName (or relevant service) to find the binary path, then check permissions on that executable
    Affected if The service binary or its parent folder is writable by non-admin users, allowing DLL/hijacking

If VIPRE Advanced Security is installed and any installation folder or service binary path grants write access to low-privileged users or Everyone, the environment is affected by this permission escalation vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patch or update to a corrected version that properly secures folder permissions; verify no lingering permission misconfigurations remain.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13703 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13703 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data