CVE-2025-13797
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was detected in ADSLR B-QE2W401 250814-r037c. Affected by this issue is the function parameterdel_swifimac of the file /send_order.cgi. Performing manipulation of the argument del_swifimac results in command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in the del_swifimac parameter of /send_order.cgi on ADSLR B-QE2W401 firmware 250814-r037c allows remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands due to insufficient input validation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 250814-r037cCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelLocate the device label or check the web management interface for the model number B-QE2W401 or similar Adslr brandingAffected if The device is an Adslr B-QE2W401 unit
-
Check installed firmware versionAccess the device web interface or check system settings for the firmware build number. Compare against the affected version 250814-r037c or earlierAffected if Firmware version is 250814-r037c or any version lower (earlier) than it
-
Verify web management interface is accessibleAttempt to access the device HTTP/HTTPS management interface from a remote host or check if the web service is listening on the deviceAffected if The web management interface responds to requests
-
Confirm presence of vulnerable endpointCheck if the URI /send_order.cgi is accessible on the device web serverAffected if The /send_order.cgi endpoint responds to requests
-
Assess network exposure of management interfaceDetermine if the device management interface is reachable from untrusted networks or directly from the internetAffected if The management interface is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet
The device is affected if it is an Adslr B-QE2W401 with firmware version 250814-r037c or earlier and the /send_order.cgi endpoint is accessible on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedIsolate the affected device behind a firewall or network segmentation; restrict access to the management interface to trusted IPs only; implement ingress filtering at upstream network devices to block malicious requests to /send_order.cgi until vendor firmware patch is available.
- Isolate the affected device (B-QE2W401) on a restricted network segment to limit exposure to untrusted users
- Place the device behind a firewall and restrict access to the management interface (HTTP/HTTPS ports) to only trusted IP addresses
- If remote access is required, implement VPN authentication before permitting any access to the device's web interface
- Monitor network traffic for suspicious requests to /send_order.cgi, particularly those containing the del_swifimac parameter
- Consider replacing the affected device with an alternative product from a vendor that provides security updates
- Document the risk and accept it in writing if the device must remain in production without vendor patches
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13797 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13797 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data