CVE-2025-13814
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in moxi159753 Mogu Blog v2 up to 5.2. Impacted is the function LocalFileServiceImpl.uploadPictureByUrl of the file /file/uploadPicsByUrl. The manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /file/uploadPicsByUrl endpoint of Mogu Blog v2 allows remote attackers to make the server fetch arbitrary URLs through the LocalFileServiceImpl.uploadPictureByUrl function, potentially exposing internal services and data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Mogu Blog installationIdentify if the Mogu Blog application is deployed on your server by checking web application files, services, or HTTP headers for 'mogublog' or 'Mogu' identifiers.Affected if Mogu Blog v2 is installed on the server
-
Check installed versionLocate and read the version file or build configuration (such as pom.xml, application.yml, or a version manifest) to determine the exact Mogu Blog version.Affected if The installed version is 5.2 or any lower version
-
Verify endpoint accessibilitySend an HTTP GET or POST request to the /file/uploadPicsByUrl endpoint to confirm it is exposed and reachable.Affected if The endpoint responds and accepts requests (indicating it is not disabled or restricted)
-
Confirm vulnerable module is activeInspect the deployed application code or configuration to verify that LocalFileServiceImpl with the uploadPictureByUrl function is loaded and operational.Affected if LocalFileServiceImpl.uploadPictureByUrl is present and enabled in the application
You are affected if Mogu Blog v2 version 5.2 or lower is running and the /file/uploadPicsByUrl endpoint is accessible with the LocalFileServiceImpl module enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDisable or restrict the /file/uploadPicsByUrl endpoint, implement strict URL allow-listing with validation, and apply network segmentation to prevent internal service exposure.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13814 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13814 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data