CVE-2025-13819
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpen redirect in the web server component of MiR Robot and Fleet software allows a remote attacker to redirect users to arbitrary external websites via a crafted parameter, facilitating phishing or social engineering attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOpen redirect vulnerability in the web server component of MiR Robot and Fleet software allows remote attackers to craft malicious URLs containing a manipulated parameter that redirects users to arbitrary external websites. This occurs due to insufficient validation of redirect targets in the web server, enabling phishing and social engineering attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify MiR software installation and versionLocate MiR Robot or Fleet software on the system. Check common installation paths such as /opt/mir, /usr/local/mir, or examine running processes. Use commands like 'dpkg -l | grep -i mir', 'rpm -qa | grep -i mir', or 'ps aux | grep mir' to find installed packages or processes. Review any available about or version pages in the web interface.Affected if If MiR Robot or Fleet software is present and its version matches or falls within affected version ranges (compare against vendor release notes or security advisories for this CVE).
-
Confirm web server component is accessibleIdentify if the MiR web interface is exposed. Use 'netstat -tulpn' or 'ss -tulpn' to list listening ports. Typical ports include 8080, 8443, or standard HTTP/HTTPS ports (80/443). Verify the web service is responding by accessing the interface via browser or curl.Affected if If the MiR web server component is running and network-accessible (even on local interface).
-
Test redirect parameter for open redirect behaviorIdentify URL parameters used for redirects in the web interface (common names include 'redirect', 'url', 'next', 'dest', or 'destination'). Send a crafted request with an external domain as the parameter value, such as '?redirect=http://example.com' or '?url=http://evil-site.com'. Inspect the HTTP response headers (Location header) and body for evidence of the external URL being accepted.Affected if If the application redirects to arbitrary external domains specified in user-controlled parameters without validating they are internal URLs or whitelisted domains.
A user is affected if MiR Robot or Fleet software with a vulnerable web server version is installed and the redirect parameter accepts unvalidated external URLs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict validation of redirect parameters by enforcing a whitelist of allowed destinations or ensuring all redirects remain within the same origin. Disable external redirects unless explicitly required and validate all user-supplied redirect parameters.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13819 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13819 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data