McphubApplication · Mcphubx

CVE-2025-13822

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.11.0 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
MCPHub in versions below 0.11.0 is vulnerable to authentication bypass. Some endpoints are not protected by authentication middleware, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to perform actions in the name of other users and using their privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

MCPHub versions below 0.11.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where certain API endpoints lack proper authentication middleware protection. This allows unauthenticated attackers to access privileged functionality and perform actions on behalf of other authenticated users by leveraging the unprotected endpoints.

MitigationUpgrade MCPHub to version 0.11.0 or later, which includes proper authentication middleware on all protected endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
McphubApplication
Affected:< 0.11.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed MCPHub version
    Run 'mcphub --version' or check the package.json/changelog file in the MCPHub installation directory to determine the exact version number
    Affected if Version is below 0.11.0
  2. Verify authentication middleware configuration
    Inspect the API route definitions in the MCPHub source code or configuration files to identify which endpoints have authentication middleware and which ones may be missing it
    Affected if Protected endpoints are found without authentication middleware attached
  3. Test API endpoint accessibility
    Send unauthenticated HTTP requests to privileged API endpoints (such as those handling user data, configuration changes, or administrative functions) and observe if access is granted without credentials
    Affected if Unauthenticated requests successfully access privileged endpoints that should require authentication
  4. Review authentication logs
    Examine MCPHub access logs or authentication audit logs for successful unauthenticated access attempts to privileged endpoints
    Affected if Logs show successful access to privileged APIs without valid authentication tokens

You are affected if MCPHub version is below 0.11.0 AND unauthenticated access to privileged API endpoints is possible without proper authentication validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.11.0 or later
Fixed in 0.11.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade MCPHub to version 0.11.0 or later, which includes proper authentication middleware on all protected endpoints.

Recommended fix High confidence

Mcphub 0.11.0

  1. Identify the currently installed Mcphub version by checking the application or package manager
  2. Backup the Mcphub installation directory and any associated database or configuration files
  3. Upgrade Mcphub to version 0.11.0 using the package manager or by installing the updated release from the official repository
  4. Verify that authentication middleware is now properly applied to all protected endpoints
  5. Test that unauthenticated access to sensitive endpoints is properly denied

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Mcphub Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13822 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13822 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data