CVE-2025-13872
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBlind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of ObjectPlanet Opinio 7.26 rev12562 on Web-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests to an arbitrary destination.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the survey-import feature of ObjectPlanet Opinio 7.26. Attackers can craft malicious import requests to force the server into making HTTP GET requests to arbitrary destinations, enabling internal network reconnaissance, service exploitation, or data exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.26CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm ObjectPlanet Opinio installationIdentify the Opinio application in your environment and determine its version number through the web interface (typically found in admin panel, footer, or about page) or by checking installed software recordsAffected if The installed version is ObjectPlanet Opinio 7.26 exactly
-
Verify survey-import feature existsLocate the survey-import functionality within the Opinio admin interface - typically found under Survey or Import sections in the administration panelAffected if The survey-import feature is present and accessible to users with import permissions
-
Check URL import capabilityExamine the survey-import feature to determine if it accepts external URLs as import sources - look for options to import from URL/remote file locationsAffected if The feature allows importing surveys or data from arbitrary URL sources without strict validation
-
Test for SSRF reachability (if authorized)If you have a test environment, attempt a controlled import with a URL pointing to an internal or localhost endpoint to confirm the vulnerability existsAffected if The server successfully makes HTTP GET requests to arbitrary destinations supplied through the import feature
You are affected if ObjectPlanet Opinio 7.26 is installed and the survey-import feature allows importing from arbitrary URLs, allowing an attacker to trigger blind SSRF requests to internal or external systems.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict allowlist-based URL validation for all survey-import functionality, restrict outbound network access from the server, and disable or sandbox features that allow importing from arbitrary URLs.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13872 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13872 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data