CVE-2025-13953
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBypass vulnerability in the authentication method in the GTT Tax Information System application, related to the Active Directory (LDAP) login method. Authentication is performed through a local WebSocket, but the web application does not properly validate the authenticity or origin of the data received, allowing an attacker with access to the local machine or internal network to impersonate the legitimate WebSocket and inject manipulated information. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow an attacker to authenticate as any user in the domain, without the need for valid credentials, compromising the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application and its data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe GTT Tax Information System uses a local WebSocket for authentication via Active Directory (LDAP). The application fails to validate the authenticity or origin of WebSocket data, allowing an attacker with local machine or internal network access to impersonate the legitimate WebSocket server and inject manipulated authentication data. This enables authentication as any domain user without valid credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify GTT Tax Information System installationSearch for GTT Tax Information System in installed programs (Windows: Add/Remove Programs, Linux: package manager or /opt directory), or check for processes named 'gtt', 'tax', or related service names running on the hostAffected if The application is installed and running on the target system
-
Verify WebSocket service is activeCheck for listening WebSocket ports (common: 8080, 8443, or custom ports in application documentation), use netstat or ss to list open ports, or check application process for WebSocket module loadingAffected if A WebSocket service is bound to a network port and accepting connections
-
Confirm WebSocket-based LDAP authentication is configuredExamine application configuration files (look for XML, JSON, YAML, or .config files in application directory) for LDAP/Active Directory integration settings that reference WebSocket, WS, or websocket authentication methodsAffected if LDAP/Active Directory authentication is configured to use WebSocket transport
-
Check WebSocket endpoint accessibilityReview network binding configuration to determine if WebSocket listens on localhost only or on accessible network interfaces (0.0.0.0 or specific IP), check firewall rules or application host configurationAffected if WebSocket is accessible from internal network or localhost rather than restricted to loopback-only with strong authentication
-
Inspect WebSocket data validation settingsReview application configuration or source code for origin validation, cryptographic signatures, token-based authentication, or mutual TLS settings on the WebSocket endpointAffected if WebSocket authentication lacks origin validation, cryptographic signing, tokens, or mTLS
The environment is affected if GTT Tax Information System is installed with WebSocket-based LDAP authentication enabled and the WebSocket endpoint lacks proper origin and data authenticity validation, making it exploitable by attackers with local or internal network access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper WebSocket origin and data authenticity validation (e.g., cryptographic signatures, token-based authentication, mutual TLS), restrict WebSocket endpoints to authorized components, and add network segmentation to limit local/internal network attack surface.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13953 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13953 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data