CVE-2025-14153
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Page Expire Popup/Redirection for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based SQL Injection via the 'id' shortcode attribute in all versions up to, and including, 1.0 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Page Expire Popup/Redirection WordPress plugin fails to properly escape the 'id' shortcode attribute and lacks prepared statements in its SQL queries. This allows authenticated attackers with Author-level or higher access to inject arbitrary SQL commands through the id parameter, potentially extracting sensitive data from the database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify plugin installationCheck if the Page Expire Popup/Redirection plugin is installed in wp-content/plugins/ or listed in WordPress admin under PluginsAffected if Plugin is installed and active on the WordPress site
-
Identify installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin PHP file and locate the Version header in the plugin comments, or view the version in WordPress admin plugin listAffected if Version is unknown or older than the patched version (contact vendor for exact patch version)
-
Search for shortcode usageSearch WordPress database or content files for the plugin shortcode (commonly [page_expire] or similar) that includes an 'id' parameterAffected if Content contains the shortcode with an 'id' attribute being used
-
Review user role permissionsNavigate to WordPress admin Users section and identify accounts with Author-level or higher capabilitiesAffected if There are one or more users with Author, Editor, or Administrator roles who could access the vulnerable shortcode
Your site is affected if the Page Expire Popup/Redirection plugin is active AND uses the shortcode with an 'id' parameter AND has users with Author-level or higher access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the plugin to the latest version once available, which should include proper input sanitization and prepared SQL statements. Alternatively, restrict shortcode usage to trusted users only until a patch is applied.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14153 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14153 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data