CVE-2025-14251
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in code-projects Online Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ of the component Admin Login. Such manipulation of the argument Username leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the Admin Login component of code-projects Online Ordering System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the Username parameter at the /admin/ endpoint. This critical flaw enables unauthenticated attackers to manipulate database queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed applicationCheck your web server for the Fabian Online Ordering System installation directory or look for its files. Common paths include /var/www/html/, /www/, or within your web application's document root.Affected if The Fabian Online Ordering System is present on the server.
-
Verify the application versionLocate a version file, readme, or any file containing version information within the installation directory. Compare the version number to 1.0.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.
-
Confirm admin endpoint accessibilityAccess the URL path /admin/ on the server where the application is hosted (e.g., http://yourdomain.com/admin/). Check if the login form loads successfully.Affected if The admin login form at /admin/ is accessible and responds with a login page.
-
Check for dynamic SQL usage in login codeIf you have access to the source code, locate the login processing file in the admin directory. Examine the code handling the Username parameter for direct string concatenation in SQL queries without parameterized queries or prepared statements.Affected if The login code constructs SQL queries by directly inserting the Username parameter into the query string.
You are affected if the Fabian Online Ordering System version 1.0 is installed, the /admin/ login form is accessible, and the application uses dynamic SQL queries in the login functionality without input sanitization or parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database operations in the login functionality, or apply any available vendor patch. Restrict network access to the admin panel as an interim measure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14251 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14251 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data