CVE-2025-14256
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was detected in itsourcecode Student Management System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /newcurriculm.php. Performing manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA critical SQL injection vulnerability exists in itsourcecode Student Management System 1.0 within the /newcurriculm.php file. The ID parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries and potentially exfiltrate or manipulate the database. This unauthenticated, remote attack has a CVSS score of 9.8 indicating immediate exploitation risk.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the Student Management System versionLocate and inspect the application. Check for version indicators such as version files, headers, or admin interface version displays that show version 1.0Affected if The installed version is Angeljudesuarez Student Management System 1.0
-
Verify the presence of the vulnerable fileCheck for the existence of /newcurriculm.php in the web root directory or application pathAffected if The file newcurriculm.php exists on the server
-
Check if the ID parameter is exposed without authenticationAttempt to access the newcurriculm.php endpoint directly via HTTP GET or POST request without providing any authentication credentialsAffected if The page is accessible without authentication and accepts an ID parameter
-
Identify database user privilegesReview the database configuration file (commonly config.php, db.php, or similar in the application root) to determine what database user credentials the application uses and its privilege levelAffected if The application connects to the database with a user that has elevated privileges beyond what is required for the application functionality
If the environment is running Angeljudesuarez Student Management System version 1.0 with the newcurriculm.php file accessible without authentication and accepting user-supplied ID parameters, it is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database operations involving the ID parameter in newcurriculm.php, and perform comprehensive input validation. Additionally, apply principle of least privilege to the database user and consider deploying a WAF as a defense-in-depth measure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14256 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14256 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data