CVE-2025-14294
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Razorpay for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the getCouponList() function in all versions up to, and including, 4.7.8. This is due to the checkAuthCredentials() permission callback always returning true, providing no actual authentication. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the billing and shipping contact information (email and phone) of any WooCommerce order by knowing or guessing the order ID.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Razorpay for WooCommerce plugin has a REST API endpoint with getCouponList() function whose checkAuthCredentials() permission callback always returns true, providing no authentication. This allows unauthenticated attackers to modify billing and shipping contact information (email, phone) of any WooCommerce order by knowing or guessing the order ID.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Razorpay for WooCommerce is installedNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and confirm 'Razorpay for WooCommerce' appears in the installed plugins list, or check the filesystem at wp-content/plugins/ for a razorpay-woocommerce directoryAffected if The plugin is installed and active
-
Check the installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin > Plugins, click on the Razorpay for WooCommerce plugin to view its version, or read the version from the plugin's main PHP file header in wp-content/plugins/razorpay-woocommerce/Affected if The version is lower than 4.7.9 (e.g., 4.7.8, 4.7.7, etc.)
-
Identify the vulnerable REST API endpointLocate the plugin file containing the getCouponList() function, typically in includes/class-razorpay-api.php or similar within the plugin directory, and identify the associated REST route (usually /razorpay/v1/coupons or similar)Affected if The getCouponList() function exists in the plugin code and is registered as a REST API endpoint
-
Verify the vulnerable permission callbackExamine the REST route registration code for the coupon endpoint and locate the checkAuthCredentials() permission callback function - confirm it returns true without performing any actual capability or authentication checksAffected if checkAuthCredentials() unconditionally returns true or has no authentication logic
-
Test unauthenticated access to the endpointSend a GET or POST request to the plugin's REST API endpoint (e.g., /wp-json/razorpay/v1/coupons) using a tool like curl or browser DevTools without providing any authentication credentialsAffected if The endpoint returns a valid response (not a 401/403 authentication error)
-
Confirm order modification is possibleUsing an HTTP client, send a request to modify billing/shipping contact fields on a known WooCommerce order ID via the affected endpoint without authenticationAffected if The request succeeds and the order contact information is modified without requiring authentication
You are affected if Razorpay for WooCommerce version lower than 4.7.9 is installed AND the checkAuthCredentials() callback returns true unconditionally, allowing unauthenticated modification of order contact details via the REST API endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to version 4.7.9 or later which implements proper capability checking on the affected REST API endpoint, or disable the plugin until the patch can be applied.
Latest version available in WordPress plugin repository (version higher than 4.7.8)
- Check the WordPress plugin repository or WooCommerce settings for the currently installed version of Razorpay for WooCommerce
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in the WordPress admin dashboard
- Locate the Razorpay for WooCommerce plugin
- If an update is available, update to the latest version available in the WordPress plugin repository
- After updating, verify that the plugin is functioning correctly by placing a test order
- Confirm that the checkAuthCredentials() function now properly validates user permissions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14294 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14294 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data