CVE-2025-14341
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproperly controlled modification of Dynamically-Determined object attributes, Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in DivvyDrive Information Technologies Inc. DivvyDrive allows Excessive Allocation, Flooding. This issue affects DivvyDrive: from 4.8.2.19 before 4.8.3.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDivvyDrive versions 4.8.2.19 through before 4.8.3.2 contain an improperly controlled modification vulnerability where attackers can manipulate dynamically-determined object attributes without proper validation, combined with a resource allocation flaw allowing excessive allocation/flooding. This can lead to resource exhaustion or denial of service through unbounded attribute manipulation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed DivvyDrive versionCheck the DivvyDrive application version through its built-in about dialog, startup logs, or by querying the installed package. Common locations include the application settings menu, a 'divvydrive --version' command if CLI is available, or the software inventory on the system.Affected if The installed version is 4.8.2.19, 4.8.2.20, 4.8.2.21, 4.8.2.22, 4.8.2.23, 4.8.2.24, 4.8.2.25, 4.8.2.26, 4.8.2.27, 4.8.2.28, 4.8.2.29, 4.8.3.0, or 4.8.3.1 (any version from 4.8.2.19 up to but not including 4.8.3.2).
-
Confirm attribute manipulation feature is in useReview DivvyDrive configuration files or audit logs for usage of dynamic attribute manipulation features, particularly any feature that allows users to define or modify object attributes at runtime. Check if the application exposes APIs or interfaces that accept attribute parameters from user input.Affected if Dynamic object attribute modification features are enabled and accessible to users or unauthenticated attackers.
-
Inspect for excessive resource allocation indicatorsMonitor DivvyDrive process resource usage and review application logs for patterns of repeated attribute creation, memory growth, or allocation errors. Look for log entries indicating unbounded object creation or memory pressure events.Affected if Logs or monitoring show repeated attribute manipulation requests, escalating memory consumption, or resource exhaustion events without proper throttling.
-
Check for rate limiting configurationExamine DivvyDrive configuration files or infrastructure-level settings for rate limiting, throttling, or resource quota enforcement on attribute manipulation operations.Affected if No rate limiting or resource quotas are configured on attribute manipulation endpoints or operations.
You are affected if DivvyDrive is installed at any version from 4.8.2.19 through 4.8.3.1 AND the dynamic attribute manipulation feature is accessible and unprotected by rate limiting or resource quotas.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade DivvyDrive to version 4.8.3.2 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, implement rate limiting and resource quotas at the infrastructure level to mitigate excessive allocation attempts.
4.8.3.2 or later
- 1. Identify the current DivvyDrive version by checking the application settings or system information panel
- 2. If the installed version is 4.8.2.19 or any version before 4.8.3.2, this instance is vulnerable
- 3. Obtain the updated DivvyDrive version 4.8.3.2 or later from the official vendor
- 4. Back up the current DivvyDrive configuration and data according to backup procedures
- 5. Apply the upgrade to DivvyDrive version 4.8.3.2 or latest stable release
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version number
- 7. Test critical functionality to ensure the application operates normally after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14341 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14341 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data