CVE-2025-14438
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Xagio SEO – AI Powered SEO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.1.0.30 via the 'pixabayDownloadImage' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Xagio SEO WordPress plugin has a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the pixabayDownloadImage function, allowing authenticated users with Subscriber-level permissions to make arbitrary web requests from the server. This can be exploited to probe internal services, bypass firewalls, or exfiltrate data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Xagio SEO plugin is installedLog into WordPress admin panel, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, and look for 'Xagio SEO' in the list of active pluginsAffected if Xagio SEO plugin appears in the installed plugins list
-
Identify the installed plugin versionIn the Plugins list, click on 'Xagio SEO' to view the plugin details, or check the plugin header file (usually in wp-content/plugins/xagio-seo/xagio.php) for the Version commentAffected if The version listed is 7.1.0.30 or earlier, or no version number is displayed indicating an outdated installation
-
Check for subscriber-level user accountsNavigate to WordPress Users > All Users and review the Role column; look for any users assigned the 'Subscriber' roleAffected if At least one user account with Subscriber role exists in the WordPress installation
-
Verify the pixabayDownloadImage function is accessibleAttempt to access the Pixabay image download feature via the plugin interface while logged in as a Subscriber user, or inspect the plugin file (xagio.php or related files) for the pixabayDownloadImage function definition and its capability checksAffected if The function exists in the plugin code and can be invoked by a user with Subscriber-level permissions without additional capability verification
You are affected if the Xagio SEO plugin is installed with version 7.1.0.30 or earlier AND at least one Subscriber-level user account exists in WordPress, allowing that user to trigger the vulnerable pixabayDownloadImage function.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the plugin to a version beyond 7.1.0.30 when available; otherwise, disable the plugin or restrict user permissions to prevent Subscriber-level access until a patch is released.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14438 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14438 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data