CVE-2025-14533
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Advanced Custom Fields: Extended plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.2.1. This is due to the 'insert_user' function not restricting the roles with which a user can register. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to supply the 'administrator' role during registration and gain administrator access to the site. Note: The vulnerability can only be exploited if 'role' is mapped to the custom field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Advanced Custom Fields: Extended plugin for WordPress versions up to 0.9.2.1 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in its user registration function. The 'insert_user' function fails to validate or restrict the role parameter, allowing unauthenticated attackers to register with administrator privileges by supplying 'administrator' as the role value. Exploitation requires the 'role' field to be mapped to a custom field.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check plugin versionNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins. Locate 'Advanced Custom Fields: Extended' (or ACF Extended) and verify the version number in the plugin description. Alternatively, check the plugin file header in /wp-content/plugins/acf-extended/ or similar plugin directory.Affected if Version is 0.9.2.1 or lower
-
Confirm user registration is enabledCheck the plugin settings for user registration functionality. This may be in the plugin's settings page, under Custom Fields > Settings > User Registration, or in WP admin under Users > Registration. Look for any option that enables or allows public user registration.Affected if User registration feature is active or enabled
-
Verify role field mapping existsReview all Custom Field Groups in WordPress admin (Custom Fields > Field Groups). For each group with user form settings enabled, inspect the field mappings. Specifically look for any field where the setting maps to 'role' or assigns user roles, such as a select/dropdown field with 'role' as the field name or a mapping configuration assigning user capabilities.Affected if A custom field has role mapping enabled or a 'role' field is connected to user registration forms
-
Confirm all conditions for exploitationReview the combination of findings: (1) Plugin version is 0.9.2.1 or lower, (2) user registration is enabled in the plugin, (3) a role-related field exists in a custom field group and is mapped to user registration forms. All three must be true for the vulnerability to be exploitable.Affected if Plugin version is vulnerable AND user registration is enabled AND role field mapping to custom fields is configured
The environment is affected if ACF Extended version 0.9.2.1 or lower is installed with user registration enabled and a role field mapped in custom field configurations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the plugin to version 0.9.2.2 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, disable user registration functionality or remove role mapping from custom field configurations until the update can be applied.
0.9.2.2 or later
- 1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard with administrator privileges.
- 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins.
- 3. Locate 'Advanced Custom Fields: Extended' in the plugin list.
- 4. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to install the latest version.
- 5. After updating, verify the plugin is running version 0.9.2.2 or higher.
- 6. Review custom field configurations to ensure 'role' field mappings are intentional and restricted to trusted users only.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14533 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14533 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data