dbcve.org
Authorization Bypass (IDOR)Weakness · CWE-639

CVE-2025-1469

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-21
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Turtek Software Eyotek allows Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers. This issue affects Eyotek: before 11.03.2025.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an authorization bypass vulnerability where an attacker can manipulate a user-controlled key (such as a parameter, cookie, or header) to bypass trusted identifier validation. The vulnerability allows unauthorized access to functionality or data by exploiting the application's trust in identifiers provided by the user instead of properly validating authorization on each request.

MitigationUpdate Eyotek to a version released after March 11, 2025. If immediate patching is not possible, audit all endpoints that accept user-controlled identifiers and implement proper authorization validation on every request.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Eyotek installation and version
    Locate the Eyotek application installation directory and check for version files, product information, or use any available version command-line tool (such as 'eyotek --version' or checking a VERSION file in the installation root). Compare the found version against any known fixed releases after March 2025.
    Affected if The installed version is older than the fixed release published after March 11, 2025.
  2. Locate user-controlled identifier handling code
    Search the application source code for endpoints, functions, or controllers that process user-supplied input from request parameters, cookies, or HTTP headers (such as 'request.getParameter()', 'request.getHeader()', '$_GET', '$_POST', 'req.params', or similar constructs) and use this input as an identifier for data retrieval or access decisions.
    Affected if The application code uses user-supplied input directly as identifiers without validation.
  3. Inspect authorization logic for identifier validation
    Examine the authorization or access control functions that validate whether a user is permitted to access a specific resource or perform an action. Look for cases where the code relies on an identifier provided by the user rather than verifying the user's identity or permissions on each request.
    Affected if Authorization logic trusts user-supplied identifiers without re-validating permissions on each request.
  4. Review API endpoints and data access patterns
    Audit all API endpoints or data access methods that accept identifiers (such as resource IDs, record IDs, object keys) from user requests. Check if the application verifies ownership or permissions before returning data.
    Affected if Endpoints return data based on user-supplied identifiers without verifying the user is authorized for that specific resource.
  5. Check for missing session validation
    Inspect whether requests include proper session or authentication token validation. Verify that each request that accesses sensitive data or functionality validates the user's authenticated session rather than trusting stored or previously validated identifiers.
    Affected if The application relies on cached or previously validated identifiers instead of validating authentication on each request.

You are affected if you are running any version of Eyotek released before the March 2025 patch and your application uses user-supplied identifiers for access decisions without proper per-request authorization validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Eyotek to a version released after March 11, 2025. If immediate patching is not possible, audit all endpoints that accept user-controlled identifiers and implement proper authorization validation on every request.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1469 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1469 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data