CVE-2025-14714
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Authentication Bypass vulnerability existed where the application bundled an interpreter (Python) that inherits the Transparency, Consent, and Control (TCC) permissions granted by the user to the main application bundle By executing the bundled interpreter directly the attacker's scripts run with the application's TCC privileges In fixed versions parent-constraints are used to allow only the main application to launch interpreter with those permissions This issue affects LibreOffice on macOS: from 25.2 before < 25.2.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLibreOffice bundles a Python interpreter on macOS that inherits the TCC (Transparency, Consent, and Control) permissions granted to the main application. By executing the bundled interpreter directly, attackers can run scripts with the application's TCC privileges (e.g., accessibility, screen recording), bypassing normal authentication controls. Fixed versions implement parent-constraints to ensure only the main application can launch the interpreter with those elevated permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 25.2.0.1, < 25.2.4.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm macOS platformVerify the operating system is macOS. This vulnerability only affects macOS builds of LibreOffice. Run 'uname -s' or check System Preferences.Affected if Running any operating system other than macOS means this CVE does not apply.
-
Identify installed LibreOffice versionOpen LibreOffice and go to LibreOffice > About LibreOffice, or run 'defaults read /Applications/LibreOffice.app/Contents/Info.plist CFBundleShortVersionString' in Terminal.Affected if Version is 25.2.0.1 or higher but lower than 25.2.4.1, meaning it falls within the range >= 25.2.0.1 and < 25.2.4.1.
-
Locate bundled Python interpreterCheck for the presence of a Python binary within the LibreOffice application bundle at路径 such as /Applications/LibreOffice.app/Contents/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/Current/bin/python3 or similar paths within the app bundle.Affected if The bundled Python interpreter exists within the LibreOffice application bundle.
-
Test direct execution of bundled interpreterAttempt to execute the bundled Python directly from Terminal, for example: '/Applications/LibreOffice.app/Contents/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/Current/bin/python3 --version'. If it runs without requiring the main LibreOffice application as parent process, the environment is vulnerable.Affected if The bundled Python interpreter executes successfully when launched directly, without validation that the parent process is the main LibreOffice application.
A user is affected if running macOS with LibreOffice version 25.2.0.1 through 25.2.3.x installed, where the bundled Python interpreter can be executed directly and inherits the application's TCC permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped25.2.4.1
Upgrade LibreOffice to version 25.2.4 or later on macOS, which implements parent-constraint validation to prevent unauthorized access to the bundled interpreter.
LibreOffice 25.2.4 or later
- Navigate to www.libreoffice.org and download LibreOffice version 25.2.4 or later for macOS
- Uninstall the current vulnerable LibreOffice version (25.2.0.1 through 25.2.3.x)
- Install the fixed LibreOffice 25.2.4 or later version
- Verify the fix by launching LibreOffice and checking Help > About LibreOffice confirms version 25.2.4 or higher
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14714 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14714 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data