CVE-2025-14876
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in the virtio-crypto device of QEMU. A malicious guest operating system can exploit a missing length limit in the AKCIPHER path, leading to uncontrolled memory allocation. This can result in a denial of service (DoS) on the host system by causing the QEMU process to terminate unexpectedly.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA missing length limit in the AKCIPHER (Asymmetric Key Cipher) processing path of QEMU's virtio-crypto device allows a malicious guest OS to trigger uncontrolled memory allocation, causing the QEMU process to crash and resulting in host-side denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check QEMU versionRun `qemu-system-x86_64 --version` or `qemu --version` to determine the installed QEMU versionAffected if The installed QEMU version predates the security fix for CVE-2025-14876 (compare your version to the fixed release)
-
Identify virtio-crypto device usageExamine the QEMU command line or libvirt domain XML for the presence of `-device virtio-crypto-pci`, `virtio-crypto-ccw`, or similar virtio-crypto device definitionsAffected if The virtio-crypto device is configured and exposed to a guest VM
-
Check for active virtio-crypto processesRun `ps aux | grep qemu` or examine running VM configurations to identify if any QEMU instances have virtio-crypto enabledAffected if A running QEMU process is actively using the virtio-crypto device
-
Verify guest access to virtio-cryptoReview the VM configuration to confirm whether untrusted or external guests have direct access to the virtio-crypto device (check for device passthrough or host device assignments)Affected if Untrusted guests can access the virtio-crypto device directly
You are affected if your QEMU version is unpatched AND you are exposing the virtio-crypto device to any guest VMs, particularly untrusted ones.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate QEMU to the version containing the patched length validation in the virtio-crypto AKCIPHER handler; consider restricting or monitoring virtio-crypto device usage from untrusted guests as a defense-in-depth measure.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14876 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14876 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data