NetcdfApplication · Unidata

CVE-2025-14932

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2025-12-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
NSF Unidata NetCDF-C Time Unit Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of NSF Unidata NetCDF-C. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of time units. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-27273.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in NSF Unidata NetCDF-C's time unit parsing function. The parser fails to validate the length of user-supplied data before copying it into a fixed-size stack buffer, allowing attackers to overwrite stack memory and achieve remote code execution through malicious files or web pages.

MitigationApply vendor patches for NetCDF-C to add proper bounds checking in time unit parsing routines. Until patches are available, restrict access to untrusted NetCDF files and disable automatic file loading in vulnerable applications.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
NetcdfApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify NetCDF-C library installation
    Run 'nc-config --version' or 'nc-config --all' to check if NetCDF-C is installed and get version details. On Linux, also check 'ldconfig -p | grep netcdf' to list linked NetCDF libraries.
    Affected if NetCDF-C libraries are present on the system and version cannot be determined or shows any version
  2. Find applications using NetCDF
    Search for binaries or applications that link to NetCDF libraries using 'ldd <executable>' or check for NetCDF file associations (.nc, .cdf extensions) in the environment with 'find / -name "*.nc" 2>/dev/null'.
    Affected if Applications link to libnetcdf or process .nc/.cdf files
  3. Determine if applications process untrusted NetCDF files
    Review application configuration and logs to identify if NetCDF files from untrusted sources (external users, web uploads, network sources) are being parsed automatically.
    Affected if Applications automatically load or parse NetCDF files from untrusted or external sources
  4. Inspect network exposure of NetCDF processing
    Check if any web-facing or network service application uses NetCDF libraries and accepts file uploads or external data streams. Review application network listeners and file upload handlers.
    Affected if Network services accept NetCDF files from clients or external sources

Users are affected if NetCDF-C is installed and any application automatically parses NetCDF files from untrusted or external sources without additional validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches for NetCDF-C to add proper bounds checking in time unit parsing routines. Until patches are available, restrict access to untrusted NetCDF files and disable automatic file loading in vulnerable applications.

Fix this in Netcdf Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14932 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14932 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data