CVE-2025-14977
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Dokan: AI Powered WooCommerce Multivendor Marketplace Solution – Build Your Own Amazon, eBay, Etsy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to, and including, 4.2.4 via the `/wp-json/dokan/v1/settings` REST API endpoint due to missing validation on a user-controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with customer-level permissions and above, to read or modify other vendors' store settings including sensitive payment information (PayPal email, bank account details, routing numbers, IBAN, SWIFT codes), phone numbers, and addresses, and change PayPal email addresses to attacker-controlled addresses, enabling financial theft when the marketplace processes payouts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Dokan plugin for WordPress versions up to 4.2.4 contains an Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability in the `/wp-json/dokan/v1/settings` REST API endpoint. The endpoint fails to validate that the authenticated user has authorization to access or modify specific vendor settings, allowing any authenticated user with customer-level permissions to read or modify other vendors' sensitive payment information including PayPal emails, bank account details, routing numbers, IBAN, and SWIFT codes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Dokan plugin versionNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and locate Dokan, or inspect the plugin file header at /wp-content/plugins/dokan/includes/class-plugin.php or check the version defined in the main plugin fileAffected if The installed version is lower than 4.2.5 (the fixed release)
-
Confirm REST API endpoint accessibilitySend a GET request to /wp-json/dokan/v1/settings with a low-privilege user session (customer role or above) and observe if the endpoint respondsAffected if The endpoint returns a successful response for non-administrator users, indicating the vulnerability is exposed
-
Check for vendor ID parameter handlingSubmit a request to /wp-json/dokan/v1/settings with a modified vendor_id parameter referencing a different vendor than the authenticated user, and check if the API returns that vendor's settingsAffected if The API returns settings for a vendor other than the one associated with the authenticated user, confirming the IDOR is present
-
Review user role configurationInspect the WordPress user roles assigned to test accounts, verifying that customer-level or higher roles can access the Dokan REST API endpointsAffected if Customer, vendor, or other non-administrator roles have REST API access to the /wp-json/dokan/v1/settings endpoint
You are affected if the Dokan plugin version is below 4.2.5 and the REST API endpoint /wp-json/dokan/v1/settings is accessible to non-administrator users without proper vendor ID authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRestrict access by implementing proper authorization checks in the REST API endpoint to verify the requesting user owns or has permission to modify the specific vendor settings being accessed, and validate user capabilities before returning or accepting any sensitive payment data.
Latest version after 4.2.4 (check wordpress.org for current stable release)
- Log in to WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Find the Dokan plugin in the list
- Click 'Update now' if an update is available, or manually upload the latest version from wordpress.org
- Verify the update completes successfully
- Test that the `/wp-json/dokan/v1/settings` endpoint now properly validates user permissions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14977 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14977 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data