CVE-2025-15011
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in code-projects Simple Stock System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /logout.php. The manipulation of the argument uname results in sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability exists in the /logout.php file of Simple Stock System 1.0. The 'uname' parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL code. This could enable complete database compromise, including data exfiltration, modification, or deletion.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Simple Stock System is installedLocate the web application's installation directory on the server. Look for files belonging to the Simple Stock System, particularly /logout.php.Affected if The application directory contains Simple Stock System files.
-
Verify the product versionCheck the application's version information. This may be in a README file, about page, or version metadata within the source code.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.
-
Confirm /logout.php exists and uses the 'uname' parameterExamine the /logout.php file in the web root. Search for code that handles the 'uname' parameter, such as $_GET['uname'] or $_POST['uname'], and verify if this value is directly concatenated into a SQL query without sanitization or prepared statements.Affected if The file exists and contains direct SQL query construction using the 'uname' parameter without parameterized queries or input sanitization.
-
Check if the logout function is accessibleDetermine if the /logout.php endpoint is reachable over the network (HTTP/HTTPS). Attempt to access it or check web server access logs for requests to this endpoint.Affected if The endpoint is accessible and processes user-supplied 'uname' input.
You are affected if Simple Stock System version 1.0 is installed, the /logout.php file exists with the vulnerable 'uname' parameter handling, and that endpoint is accessible to process requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements for the 'uname' parameter in /logout.php, and implement proper input validation to prevent SQL injection attacks.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-15011 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-15011 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data