CVE-2025-15016
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedEnterprise Cloud Database developed by Ragic has a Hard-coded Cryptographic Key vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to exploit the fixed key to generate verification information and log into the system as any user.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRagic Enterprise Cloud Database contains a hard-coded cryptographic key embedded in the software. Unauthenticated remote attackers can exploit this fixed key to generate valid verification information and authenticate as any user in the system, achieving full unauthorized access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Ragic Enterprise Cloud Database is runningIdentify the Ragic process or service running in your environment using process monitoring tools (task manager, ps, or service management tools) or by checking open network listeners on common ports (typically 443, 8443 for web interfaces)Affected if Ragic Enterprise Cloud Database is installed and running on the system
-
Check network exposure of Ragic interfaceDetermine if the Ragic web interface is accessible from untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules, exposed ports, and network ACLs protecting the applicationAffected if The Ragic interface is accessible from the internet or untrusted networks without proper network segmentation
-
Search for embedded cryptographic keys in application filesInspect files in the Ragic installation directory for hard-coded cryptographic keys, credentials, or secret values - check configuration files, properties files, application binaries, and source code if accessible. Look for static key values, symmetric encryption keys, or API secrets embedded in the code.Affected if Static or hard-coded cryptographic keys are found embedded in Ragic application files or configuration
-
Verify authentication can be bypassedIf safe to test in a non-production environment, attempt to generate authentication tokens or verification information using the known hard-coded key to confirm the vulnerability is exploitable. Otherwise, review application logs for evidence of unauthorized access or unusual authentication patterns.Affected if The hard-coded key allows generation of valid authentication tokens or evidence exists of unauthorized account access
If Ragic Enterprise Cloud Database is running and exposed to network access, the presence of a hard-coded key in the application files indicates the environment is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace the hard-coded key with securely generated, unique keys per deployment using proper key management practices, implement key rotation, and rotate any credentials or sessions that may have been compromised using the exposed key.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-15016 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-15016 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data