CVE-2025-15068
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Gmission Web Fax allows Authentication Abuse, Session Credential Falsification through Manipulation.This issue affects Web Fax: from 3.0 before 3.0.1
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in Gmission Web Fax version 3.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication controls and manipulate session credentials, enabling unauthorized access to the application's functionality and data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0, < 4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Gmission Web Fax versionLocate the software version information in the application admin panel, about page, or check the software build/deployment metadata. Compare the version number against the affected range: >= 3.0 and < 4.0Affected if The installed version falls within 3.0 through 3.x (any version below 4.0)
-
Verify if the application is accessible to unauthenticated usersAttempt to access the login page and common application endpoints without providing credentials. Observe whether the application returns any authenticated content or allows session initialization without proper authenticationAffected if The application returns authenticated content or allows session manipulation without providing valid credentials
-
Test for authentication bypass via session credential manipulationSend requests to application endpoints with manipulated session tokens, cookies, or authentication parameters while unauthenticated. Check if the application accepts these and grants accessAffected if The application accepts manipulated session credentials and provides unauthorized access to protected functionality
-
Review authentication and session configurationExamine the application configuration files, session management settings, and authentication middleware logs for any misconfigurations that could allow unauthenticated accessAffected if Configuration shows authentication checks are missing or disabled for protected endpoints
You are affected if Gmission Web Fax version 3.0 through any 3.x release is running and the application permits unauthenticated access or session credential manipulation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data4.0
Update to version 3.0.1 immediately. Apply network-level access controls as a compensating control until the patch can be deployed.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-15068 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-15068 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data