512w FirmwareOperating system · Utt

CVE-2025-15091

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-26
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.7.7-171114 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was determined in UTT 进取 512W up to 1.7.7-171114. This issue affects the function strcpy of the file /goform/formPictureUrl. This manipulation of the argument importpictureurl causes buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in UTT 进取 512W router firmware. The strcpy function in /goform/formPictureUrl copies the importpictureurl parameter without bounds checking, allowing attackers to overwrite adjacent memory and potentially execute arbitrary code remotely.

MitigationApply vendor firmware patch when available; until then, disable or restrict access to the /goform/formPictureUrl web interface and place device behind a firewall to reduce attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
512w FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= 1.7.7-171114

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the router model
    Check the device label, web interface login page, or SNMP/sysinfo for the model name 'UTT 进取 512W' or '512W'
    Affected if The device is not a UTT 512W router, then it is not affected by this specific CVE
  2. Check the firmware version
    Log into the router web interface and navigate to System Status or Firmware Upgrade page to view the current firmware version. Alternatively, check via telnet/SSH if enabled by running 'cat /proc/version' or checking /etc/version
    Affected if The firmware version is greater than 1.7.7-171114 OR the version cannot be determined, then the device may still be vulnerable if the version is unknown or <= 1.7.7-171114
  3. Verify the vulnerable web endpoint exists
    Attempt to access http://<router-ip>/goform/formPictureUrl - if the page loads or returns a response (even an error), the web interface and this endpoint are present
    Affected if The endpoint returns any response, indicating the web interface is active and the vulnerable code path exists
  4. Check network exposure of the management interface
    Review firewall rules, NAT configurations, or access lists to determine if the router's HTTP/HTTPS management port (typically 80/443) is accessible from untrusted networks such as the internet or guest VLANs
    Affected if The management interface is accessible from untrusted networks without proper access controls, then remote exploitation is possible

The device is affected if it is a UTT 进取 512W router running firmware version 1.7.7-171114 or lower AND the web management interface is accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.7.7-171114
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor firmware patch when available; until then, disable or restrict access to the /goform/formPictureUrl web interface and place device behind a firewall to reduce attack surface.

Fix this in 512w Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-15091 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-15091 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data