CVE-2025-15157
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Starfish Review Generation & Marketing for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data that can lead to privilege escalation due to a missing capability check on the 'srm_restore_options_defaults' function in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.19. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to update arbitrary options on the WordPress site. This can be leveraged to update the default role for registration to administrator and enable user registration for attackers to gain administrative user access to a vulnerable site.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Starfish Review plugin for WordPress contains a missing capability check in the 'srm_restore_options_defaults' function, allowing any authenticated user with Subscriber-level access to modify arbitrary WordPress options. Attackers can exploit this to change the default registration role to Administrator and enable user registration, achieving full administrative access to the site.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Starfish Review plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and check if the Starfish Review plugin is present and activeAffected if The Starfish Review plugin is installed and active
-
Check installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin > Plugins > Installed Plugins, locate Starfish Review and note the version number listed in the plugin metadataAffected if Version is 3.1.19 or lower
-
Inspect user registration settingGo to WordPress admin > Settings > General and examine the 'Anyone can register' checkbox - verify whether this was intentionally enabledAffected if User registration is enabled but was not manually set by an administrator
-
Review default new user roleGo to WordPress admin > Settings > General and check the 'Default Role' dropdown - confirm this setting matches what your site policy intendsAffected if Default role is set to Administrator and this was not explicitly configured by an admin
-
Audit for unauthorized admin accountsGo to WordPress admin > Users and examine all accounts with Administrator role - look for accounts you do not recognize or did not createAffected if Unexpected administrator-level accounts exist in the system
The environment is affected if the Starfish Review plugin version is 3.1.19 or lower and either user registration settings, default role, or unauthorized admin accounts are present without deliberate admin configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the plugin to version 3.1.20 or later which includes proper capability checks. Consider disabling user registration or monitoring for unauthorized administrative accounts until the patch is applied.
Starfish Review Generation & Marketing plugin version 3.1.20 or later
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in the WordPress admin dashboard
- Locate the 'Starfish Review Generation & Marketing' plugin
- Check the current version (should be 3.1.19 or lower)
- Update the plugin to the latest available version (3.1.20 or higher)
- Verify the update was successful and the plugin is now running a patched version
- Review user accounts on the site to ensure no unauthorized administrator accounts were created
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-15157 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-15157 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data