dbcve.org
Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-15285

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The SEO Flow by LupsOnline plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the checkBlogAuthentication() and checkCategoryAuthentication() functions in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.1. These authorization functions only implement basic API key authentication but fail to implement WordPress capability checks. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create, modify, and delete blog posts and categories.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The SEO Flow WordPress plugin versions up to 2.2.1 contain a broken access control vulnerability where the checkBlogAuthentication() and checkCategoryAuthentication() functions rely solely on basic API key validation without implementing WordPress capability checks. This allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass authorization and perform arbitrary CRUD operations on posts and categories.

MitigationUpgrade to version 2.2.2 or later which implements proper WordPress capability checks; alternatively, remove the plugin until a patch is available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify SEO Flow plugin is installed
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'SEO Flow' in the list
    Affected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list
  2. Check installed version number
    In the plugins list, look at the version column for SEO Flow; or check the plugin main file header in wp-content/plugins/seo-flow/ or similar path
    Affected if Version is 2.2.1 or lower
  3. Confirm API functionality is accessible
    Check if the plugin exposes API endpoints - look for routes like /wp-json/seoflow/ or similar in plugin code, or test HTTP access to known API paths
    Affected if API endpoints are publicly accessible without authentication beyond API key
  4. Check if API key is configured
    In WordPress admin, go to plugin settings (SEO Flow > Settings) and check if an API key is set in the configuration
    Affected if An API key is configured and active, making the flawed authentication function reachable

You are affected if SEO Flow plugin version 2.2.1 or lower is installed AND the plugin API functionality is enabled and accessible, allowing unauthenticated access to post/category CRUD operations.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to version 2.2.2 or later which implements proper WordPress capability checks; alternatively, remove the plugin until a patch is available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-15285 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-15285 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data