PhoneserviceApplication · Honor

CVE-2025-1532

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 11.0.0.276 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Phoneservice module is affected by code injection vulnerability, successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality and integrity.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A code injection vulnerability exists in the phoneservice module that allows remote attackers to inject malicious code into the service. Successful exploitation can lead to complete compromise of service confidentiality and integrity, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution on the affected system.

MitigationImplement strict input validation and sanitization on all user-controlled inputs in the phoneservice module; review and secure code execution pathways to prevent injection attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PhoneserviceApplication
Affected:< 11.0.0.276

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the phoneservice module
    Check your system for the presence of the phoneservice module or service. On Android devices, this may appear as a system app or service process related to telephony.
    Affected if The phoneservice module is found running on the system
  2. Determine installed phoneservice version
    Retrieve the version number of the phoneservice module. This may be found in the app's package information, system settings about phone, or by querying the system package manager for the phoneservice component.
    Affected if Version is below 11.0.0.276
  3. Verify input-handling functionality is accessible
    Examine whether the phoneservice module accepts external input through any API endpoints, dial codes, or configuration interfaces that could accept unsanitized data.
    Affected if Input paths to phoneservice are exposed and accessible to untrusted sources
  4. Check for custom telephony configurations
    Review any custom dial plans, SIM toolkit configurations, or telephony-related settings that process user-supplied data within the phoneservice context.
    Affected if Custom or third-party telephony configurations that feed unsanitized input to phoneservice are present

You are affected if the phoneservice module is present and its installed version is lower than 11.0.0.276, with accessible input paths that could accept unsanitized data into the service.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 11.0.0.276 or later
Fixed in 11.0.0.276
Interim mitigation

Implement strict input validation and sanitization on all user-controlled inputs in the phoneservice module; review and secure code execution pathways to prevent injection attacks.

Recommended fix High confidence

11.0.0.276 or later

  1. Contact Honor support or check official Honor update channels for the Phoneservice module version 11.0.0.276 or later
  2. Update the Phoneservice module to version 11.0.0.276 or a later patched version following Honor's standard firmware update procedure
  3. After updating, verify the Phoneservice module version to confirm the fix has been applied
  4. Restart the affected service to ensure the patched code is fully operational

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Phoneservice Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
44.0 hours of engineering $7,720
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1532 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1532 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data