CVE-2025-15409
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was determined in code-projects Online Guitar Store 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/Delete_product.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument del_pro can lead to sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the /admin/Delete_product.php script allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the 'del_pro' parameter. The lack of parameterized queries or input sanitization enables attackers to manipulate database queries, potentially allowing unauthorized data exfiltration, modification, or complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm installed product and versionIdentify if Anisha Online Guitar Store is installed and determine its version. Check application documentation, installation files, or footer/branding for version number '1.0'.Affected if The product is Anisha Online Guitar Store version 1.0
-
Locate vulnerable scriptCheck if the file /admin/Delete_product.php exists in the web root or application directory. Search for this file path on the server file system.Affected if The file /admin/Delete_product.php exists in the deployment
-
Verify admin endpoint accessibilityDetermine if the /admin/ directory is accessible without authentication or with valid admin credentials. Attempt to access the Delete_product.php script directly via HTTP request.Affected if The admin script is reachable from the network without proper access controls or the del_pro parameter is processed without sanitization
-
Inspect code for vulnerable parameterIf source code access is available, examine Delete_product.php and locate the 'del_pro' parameter usage. Verify if this parameter is directly concatenated into SQL queries without prepared statements, parameter binding, or input sanitization.Affected if The code shows direct SQL query construction using the del_pro parameter without parameterized queries or input validation
A user is affected if they run Anisha Online Guitar Store version 1.0 with the /admin/Delete_product.php script present and the del_pro parameter handled insecurely in SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all database operations. Additionally, enforce proper authentication and authorization on admin endpoints, and deploy a WAF as a defense-in-depth measure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-15409 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-15409 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data