CVE-2025-15470
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Eleganzo theme for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary directory deletion due to insufficient path validation in the akd_required_plugin_callback function in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to delete arbitrary directories on the server, including the WordPress root directory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Eleganzo WordPress theme up to version 1.2 contains a path traversal vulnerability in the akd_required_plugin_callback function that allows authenticated users with Subscriber-level permissions to delete arbitrary directories on the server due to insufficient path validation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Eleganzo theme is installedNavigate to Appearance > Themes in WordPress admin, or run: wp theme list --status=active --format=csvAffected if Eleganzo theme appears in the installed themes list
-
Identify Eleganzo theme versionIn WordPress admin, click on the Eleganzo theme details. Or check the style.css file in wp-content/themes/elegazo/ for the 'Version:' header. Or run: grep -i 'Version:' wp-content/themes/elegazo/style.cssAffected if Version is 1.2 or lower (e.g., 1.2, 1.1, 1.0)
-
Verify if user registration is enabledGo to Settings > General in WordPress admin and check 'Membership: Anyone can register'. Or run: grep -i 'users_can_register' wp-config.phpAffected if 'Anyone can register' is checked/enabled, or 'users_can_register' is set to true
-
Check for existing subscriber-level accountsGo to Users > All Users in WordPress admin and look for users with 'Subscriber' role. Or run: wp user list --role=subscriber --format=countAffected if Any subscriber accounts exist in the system
Environment is affected if Eleganzo theme version 1.2 or earlier is installed AND (user registration is enabled OR at least one subscriber account exists).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Eleganzo theme to version 1.3 or later which includes proper path validation. Alternatively, remove the theme if not in use and disable user registration to prevent subscriber-level account creation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-15470 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-15470 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data