CVE-2025-1751
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA SQL Injection vulnerability has been found in Ciges 2.15.5 from ATISoluciones. This vulnerability allows an attacker to retrieve, create, update and delete database via $idServicio parameter in /modules/ajaxBloqueaCita.php endpoint.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability in Ciges 2.15.5 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands through the idServicio parameter in the /modules/ajaxBloqueaCita.php endpoint, enabling complete compromise of the database including unauthorized read, create, update, and delete operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Ciges is deployedSearch the web server document root or application directory for folders named 'Ciges' or 'ciges', or check web server logs and configuration for references to this application.Affected if Ciges software is present in the environment
-
Determine Ciges versionCheck for a version file, README, or configuration file within the Ciges installation directory that displays the software version.Affected if The installed version matches 2.15.5 or falls within the affected range around this version
-
Locate the vulnerable endpoint fileNavigate to the /modules/ directory within the Ciges installation and verify the existence of the ajaxBloqueaCita.php file.Affected if The file /modules/ajaxBloqueaCita.php exists in the Ciges installation
-
Confirm the idServicio parameter is processedReview the ajaxBloqueaCita.php source code and search for direct use of the idServicio parameter in SQL queries without observable sanitization routines.Affected if The code directly incorporates the idServicio parameter into SQL statements without prepared statements or input validation
The environment is affected if Ciges version 2.15.5 is installed and the /modules/ajaxBloqueaCita.php endpoint processes the idServicio parameter without SQL injection protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataContact ATISoluciones for an official patch; immediately implement input validation and sanitization on the idServicio parameter and deploy a WAF with SQL injection detection rules as a temporary mitigation.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1751 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1751 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data