CVE-2025-1773
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Traveler theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via multiple parameters in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.8 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Traveler WordPress theme fails to properly sanitize and escape user-supplied input in multiple parameters before reflecting them back in HTML output. This allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript code via crafted URLs. When victims click these links, the injected scripts execute in their browsers, potentially stealing session cookies or performing actions on behalf of the user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.1.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Traveler theme is installedNavigate to Appearance > Themes in the WordPress admin dashboard and check if the Traveler theme (Shinecommerce Traveler) is listed among installed themes.Affected if Traveler theme is present in the themes directory regardless of activation status.
-
Check if Traveler theme is the active themeIn the WordPress admin under Appearance > Themes, verify which theme is currently marked as active or 'Activated'. The WordPress REST API at /wp-json/wp/v2/themes can also list active theme information.Affected if Traveler theme is the currently active theme on the WordPress site.
-
Determine the installed version of the Traveler themeLocate the version number in the Traveler theme's style.css file (typically at /wp-content/themes/traveler/style.css) or in the theme's functions.php file. The version is usually declared in the theme comment header at the top of style.css.Affected if The version number cannot be found or is lower than 3.1.9.
-
Compare version against affected rangeIf a version number was found in the previous step, compare it to the affected range: versions strictly less than 3.1.9 are vulnerable. Version 3.1.9 and later contain the fix.Affected if Installed version is less than 3.1.9 (for example: 3.1.8, 3.1.7, 3.0.0, 1.0.0, etc.).
The site is affected if the Shinecommerce Traveler theme is installed, active, and its version is lower than 3.1.9, as this allows unauthenticated reflected XSS attacks via crafted URLs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.1.9
Update the Traveler theme to version 3.1.9 or later. Until then, implement WAF rules to block requests containing suspicious characters in the affected parameters and warn users not to click untrusted links.
Traveler theme version 3.1.9
- 1. Backup your WordPress site (database and files) before making any changes
- 2. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- 3. Navigate to Appearance > Themes
- 4. Locate the Traveler theme
- 5. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to upgrade to version 3.1.9
- 6. Alternatively, download the Traveler theme version 3.1.9 from the official source (travelerwp.com)
- 7. If using manual upload, go to Appearance > Themes > Add New > Upload Theme
- 8. Upload the version 3.1.9 theme zip file and activate it
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1773 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1773 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data