CWE-426Weakness · CWE-426

CVE-2025-1804

HIGH · 7.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-03-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was found in Blizzard Battle.Net up to 2.39.0.15212 on Windows and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality in the library profapi.dll. The manipulation leads to uncontrolled search path. The attack needs to be approached locally. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The vendor assigns this issue a low risk level.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A DLL hijacking vulnerability exists in Blizzard Battle.Net's profapi.dll where the library loads DLLs from an uncontrolled search path, potentially allowing an attacker to place a malicious DLL in a location that gets loaded by the application.

MitigationUsers should ensure Battle.Net is updated to the latest version and avoid running the application from untrusted network locations; the vendor must implement secure DLL loading by using full explicit paths and removing unsafe search paths.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if Blizzard Battle.Net is installed
    Look for Battle.Net installation in common locations: C:\Program Files (x86)\Battle.net\, C:\Program Files\Battle.net\, or check Add/Remove Programs for Battle.Net entry
    Affected if Battle.Net application is present on the system
  2. Locate profapi.dll in Battle.Net directory
    Search for profapi.dll within the Battle.Net installation folder and subdirectories
    Affected if profapi.dll exists in the Battle.Net installation directory
  3. Identify the installed Battle.Net version
    Right-click Battle.net.exe, select Properties, then view the Details tab for version information; or right-click the Battle.Net icon in system tray and select About
    Affected if The installed version matches or falls within an affected version range (check against vendor advisories)
  4. Check for unsafe DLL search path configuration
    Use Process Monitor (from Sysinternals) to trace DLL loading when Battle.Net starts, looking for profapi.dll loading from locations outside the application directory
    Affected if profapi.dll is loaded from a path outside the Battle.Net installation directory, indicating uncontrolled search path usage
  5. Determine if Battle.Net is run from a network or removable drive location
    Check the installation path of Battle.Net: if it resides on a network share (\\server\share), mapped network drive, or removable media
    Affected if Battle.Net is installed or run from a network location, USB drive, or other untrusted path where an attacker could place a malicious DLL

A user is affected if Blizzard Battle.Net is installed with the vulnerable profapi.dll that loads from uncontrolled search paths, particularly when the application runs from network locations where an attacker could place a malicious DLL.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Users should ensure Battle.Net is updated to the latest version and avoid running the application from untrusted network locations; the vendor must implement secure DLL loading by using full explicit paths and removing unsafe search paths.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,790
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,864.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1804 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1804 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data