Information ExposureWeakness · CWE-200

CVE-2025-1868

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-03-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Vulnerability of unauthorized exposure of confidential information affecting Advanced IP Scanner and Advanced Port Scanner. It occurs when these applications initiate a network scan, inadvertently sending the NTLM hash of the user performing the scan. This vulnerability can be exploited by intercepting network traffic to a legitimate server or by setting up a fake server, in both local and remote scenarios. This exposure is relevant for both HTTP/HTTPS and SMB protocols.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Advanced IP Scanner and Advanced Port Scanner leak NTLM hashes during network scanning operations by inadvertently transmitting the authenticated user's credentials when connecting to network resources via HTTP/HTTPS or SMB protocols. An attacker with network proximity can intercept these hashes by sniffing traffic to legitimate servers or by positioning a malicious server to capture credentials during scan operations.

MitigationEnterprises should restrict use of these tools to isolated network segments, disable NTLM authentication where possible, and monitor for suspicious credential capture attempts. The definitive remediation requires a vendor patch that prevents NTLM hash transmission.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm installation of affected products
    Check program files for Advanced IP Scanner or Advanced Port Scanner directories, or look for installed applications in system settings
    Affected if Either Advanced IP Scanner or Advanced Port Scanner is present on the system
  2. Identify installed version
    Locate the executable (ipscan.exe or aportscan.exe), right-click and view Properties, or check Add/Remove Programs for the version number
    Affected if Version matches or falls within any affected version range (compare your version to vendor advisories)
  3. Verify NTLM authentication is active
    Check Windows Local Security Policy under Security Options for 'Network security: LAN Manager authentication level' - if set to 'Send LM & NTLM responses' or 'Send LM & NTLM - use NTLMv2 session security if negotiated', NTLM is in use
    Affected if NTLM authentication is enabled in the environment (not restricted to NTLMv2 only)
  4. Confirm scan targets include HTTP/HTTPS or SMB resources
    Review typical scan configurations or logs from Advanced IP Scanner/Port Scanner to see if the tool accesses network shares (SMB) or web servers (HTTP/HTTPS)
    Affected if Scans routinely target SMB shares or HTTP/HTTPS endpoints on the network

User is affected if either Advanced IP Scanner or Advanced Port Scanner is installed, the environment uses NTLM authentication, and scans access SMB or HTTP/HTTPS resources, allowing potential NTLM hash interception by network attackers

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Enterprises should restrict use of these tools to isolated network segments, disable NTLM authentication where possible, and monitor for suspicious credential capture attempts. The definitive remediation requires a vendor patch that prevents NTLM hash transmission.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1868 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1868 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data