CVE-2025-1869
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSQL injection vulnerability have been found in 101news affecting version 1.0 through the "username" parameter in admin/check_avalability.php.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability exists in 101news version 1.0 within the admin/check_avalability.php script. The 'username' parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary SQL code and potentially extract, modify, or delete database contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed 101news versionLocate and inspect version files, headers, or the main index page of the 101news/Mayurik Best Online News Portal application to determine if version 1.0 is deployedAffected if The installed version is 101news version 1.0 (Mayurik Best Online News Portal 1.0)
-
Verify the vulnerable script existsCheck for the presence of the file admin/check_avalability.php in the web root directory of the applicationAffected if The file admin/check_avalability.php exists on the server
-
Inspect the username parameter handling in check_avalability.phpOpen admin/check_avalability.php and locate code that handles the 'username' parameter; examine whether it is directly interpolated into SQL queries without using prepared statements, parameter binding, or proper escaping functionsAffected if The 'username' parameter is used in a SQL query without parameterized preparation or sanitization
-
Confirm admin interface is reachableVerify that the /admin/ directory or check_avalability.php script is accessible over the network without requiring authentication or with weak authentication controlsAffected if The vulnerable endpoint is exposed without adequate authentication or access restrictions
If 101news version 1.0 is installed, the admin/check_avalability.php file exists, and the username parameter is handled in SQL queries without prepared statements or escaping, the environment is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with prepared statements/parameterized queries in admin/check_avalability.php. Implement proper input validation and escaping for the username parameter, and apply the principle of least privilege to the database user.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1869 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1869 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data