Link Following (Symlink)Weakness · CWE-59

CVE-2025-20003

HIGH · 8.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper link resolution before file access ('Link Following') for some Intel(R) Graphics Driver software installers may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in Intel Graphics Driver software installers caused by improper link resolution before file access (link following/symlink attack). An authenticated local attacker could manipulate symbolic links during the driver installation process to gain elevated privileges on the system.

MitigationApply the vendor-provided patch or updated Intel Graphics Driver installer from official Intel channels. Until patched, restrict installation privileges and monitor for suspicious installer activity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Intel Graphics Driver installation
    Open Windows Settings > Apps > Installed Apps (or Programs and Features) and search for 'Intel Graphics' or 'Intel Graphics Driver', or run 'driverquery | findstr -i intel' in Command Prompt
    Affected if Intel Graphics Driver software is installed on the system
  2. Determine installed driver version
    Right-click the Intel Graphics Driver in Apps list and select 'Advanced options' to view version, or open Device Manager > Display adapters > Intel graphics > Driver tab, or run 'wmic product where "name like '%Intel%Graphics%'" get version'
    Affected if The driver version falls within the vulnerable version range (compare against Intel's official advisory for CVE-2025-20003)
  3. Check installer temporary directories for unauthorized files
    Inspect user-accessible directories where Intel installers extract temporary files (typically %TEMP% or %LOCALAPPDATA%\Temp) for unexpected files with SYSTEM privileges or new file placements after installer runs
    Affected if Unexpected files or symbolic/hard links exist in installer temp directories that could indicate exploitation attempts
  4. Audit recent file system activity in system directories
    Use Windows Event Logging (Security/Application logs) or File Explorer History to review file creation/modification in C:\Windows\System32, C:\Program Files, or C:\Program Files (x86) following any Intel Graphics Driver installation or update
    Affected if Files were created or modified in protected system directories by an untrusted user account during or after driver installation

The environment is affected if Intel Graphics Driver is installed and the installed version matches the vulnerable versions referenced in Intel's CVE-2025-20003 advisory, or if suspicious file placements exist in system directories following driver installation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor-provided patch or updated Intel Graphics Driver installer from official Intel channels. Until patched, restrict installation privileges and monitor for suspicious installer activity.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
40.0 hours of engineering $6,920
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,072.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20003 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20003 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data